Hart v. Boeing Company, Inc., The

Filing 49

ORDER granting 48 Defendants Unopposed Motion To Consolidate Related Actions. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(a) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1, Civil CaseNos. 09-cv-02208-REB-BNB, 09-cv-02209-REB-KLM, and 09-cv-02210-REB-KMT, are CONSOLIDATED with Civil Cas e No. 09-cv-00397-REB-MEH for all purposes. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1, Civil Case Nos. 09-cv-02208-REB-BNB, 09-cv-02209-REB-KLM, and 09-cv-02210-REB-KMT, are REASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Michael Hegarty. Plaintiffs in Civil Case Nos. 09-cv-0 2208, 09-cv-02209, and 09-cv-02210, SHALL FILE either a written notice of joinder in Plaintiffs Response to Defendant Boeings Motion To Dismiss 37 filed 07/01/2009, or alternatively their own, separate responses to the motion within twenty (20) days of the date of this order. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 09/28/2009.(sah, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 09-cv-00397-REB-MEH (Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 09-cv-00398-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00399-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00400-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1064-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1065-REB-MEH, 09-cv-01066REB-MEH, and 09-cv-01067-REB-MEH) JULIE HART, Plaintiff, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Civil Case No. 09-cv-02208-REB-BNB THUY NGUYEN, Plaintiff, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Civil Case No. 09-cv-02209-REB-KLM JESSICA WARREN, Plaintiff, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, INC., Defendant.

Civil Case No. 09-cv-02210-REB-KMT JAMES WARREN, Plaintiff, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, INC., Defendant. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE RELATED ACTIONS Blackburn, J. The matter before me is Defendant's Unopposed Motion To Consolidate Related Actions [#48], filed September 28, 2009. I grant the motion. As I found in a previous order granting consolidation in this matter, the three newly instituted actions ­ Civil Case No. 09-cv-02208-REB-BNB, Nguyen v. The Boeing Company, Inc., Civil Case No. 09-cv-02209-REB-KLM, Warren v. The Boeing Company, Inc.,1 and Civil Case No. 09-cv-02210-REB-KMT, Warren v. The Boeing Company, Inc. ­ implicate questions of law and fact common to those arising in the cases previously consolidated. (See Order Granting Motion To Consolidate and Denying Motions To Dismiss Without Prejudice [#32] entered June 15, 2009.) Consolidation of these actions with Civil Case No. 09-cv-00397-REB-MEH, therefore, will be appropriate and efficacious. See FED.R.CIV.P. 42(a); Breaux v. American

Civil Case Nos. 09-cv-02208 and 09-cv-02209 have been reassigned to me by separate orders. (See Order [#3] filed September 23, 2009, Civil Case No. 09-cv-02208-REB-BNB; Order [#3] filed September 23, 2009, Civil Case No. 09-cv-02209-REB-KLM.)

1

2

Family Mutual Insurance Co., 220 F.R.D. 366, 367 (D. Colo. 2004). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That Defendant's Unopposed Motion To Consolidate Related Actions [#48], filed September 28, 2009, is GRANTED; 2. That pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(a) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1, Civil Case Nos. 09-cv-02208-REB-BNB, 09-cv-02209-REB-KLM, and 09-cv-02210-REB-KMT, are CONSOLIDATED with Civil Case No. 09-cv-00397-REB-MEH for all purposes; 3. That pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1, Civil Case Nos. 09-cv-02208-REBBNB, 09-cv-02209-REB-KLM, and 09-cv-02210-REB-KMT, are REASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Michael Hegarty; 4. That all future filings in these consolidated actions shall be captioned as shown below: Civil Case No. 09-cv-00397-REB-MEH (Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 09-cv-00398-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00399-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00400-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1064-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1065-REB-MEH, 09-cv-01066REB-MEH, 09-cv-01067-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02208-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02209-REB-MEH, and 09-cv-02210-REB-MEH) JULIE HART, Plaintiff, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, INC., Defendant. and;

3

5. That plaintiffs in Civil Case Nos. 09-cv-02208, 09-cv-02209, and 09-cv-02210, SHALL FILE either a written notice of joinder in Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant Boeing's Motion To Dismiss [#37] filed July 1, 2009, or alternatively their own, separate responses to the motion within twenty (20) days of the date of this order; if plaintiffs file separate responses, defendant may file a reply within the time permitted by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1C. Dated September 28, 2009, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT:

4