Hart v. Boeing Company, Inc., The

Filing 52

ORDER granting 50 Defendants Unopposed Motion To Consolidate Related Actions. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(a) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1, Civil Case No. 09-cv-02412-CMA-MEH is CONSOLIDATED with Civil Case No. 09-cv-00397-REB-MEH for all purposes. Plai ntiff in Civil Case No. 09-cv-02412 SHALL FILE either a written notice of joinder in Plaintiffs Response to Defendant Boeings Motion To Dismiss 37 , filed 07/01/2009, or, alternatively, a separate response to the motion, by no later than 10/19/2009. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 10/15/2009.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 09-cv-00397-REB-MEH (Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 09-cv-00398-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00399-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00400-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1064-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1065-REB-MEH, 09-cv-01066REB-MEH, and 09-cv-01067-REB-MEH) JULIE HART, Plaintiff, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Civil Case No. 09-cv-02412-CMA-MEH MICHAEL STEVENS, Plaintiff, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, INC., Defendant. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE RELATED ACTIONS Blackburn, J. The matter before me is Defendant's Unopposed Motion To Consolidate Related Actions [#48] filed September 28, 2009. I grant the motion. As I found in two previous orders granting consolidation in this matter, the newly instituted action, Civil Case No. 09-cv-02412-CMA-MEH, Stevens v. The Boeing Company, Inc., implicates questions of law and fact common to those arising in the cases previously consolidated. (See Order Granting Motion To Consolidate and Denying Motions To Dismiss Without Prejudice [#32] filed June 15, 2009; Order Granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion To Consolidate Related Actions [#49] filed September 28, 2009.) Consolidation of this action into Civil Case No. 09-cv-00397REB-MEH will be appropriate and efficacious. See FED.R.CIV.P. 42(a); Breaux v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 220 F.R.D. 366, 367 (D. Colo. 2004). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That Defendant's Unopposed Motion To Consolidate Related Actions [#50] filed October 14, 2009, is GRANTED; 2. That pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(a) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1, Civil Case No. 09-cv-02412-CMA-MEH is CONSOLIDATED with Civil Case No. 09-cv-00397-REBMEH for all purposes; 3. That all future filings in these consolidated actions shall be captioned as shown below: 2 Civil Case No. 09-cv-00397-REB-MEH (Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 09-cv-00398-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00399-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00400-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1064-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1065-REB-MEH, 09-cv-01066REB-MEH, 09-cv-01067-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02208-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02209-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02210-REB-MEH, and 09-cv-02412-REB-MEH) JULIE HART, Plaintiff, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, INC., Defendant. 4. That plaintiff in Civil Case No. 09-cv-02412 SHALL FILE either a written notice of joinder in Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant Boeing's Motion To Dismiss [#37], filed July 1, 2009, or, alternatively, a separate response to the motion, by no later than October 19, 2009; if plaintiff files a separate response, defendant may file a reply within the time permitted by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1C. Dated October 15, 2009, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?