Hart v. Boeing Company, Inc., The

Filing 78

ORDER. Defendants Notice of Related Case and Unopposed Motion To Consolidate 77 filed 03/02/2010, is GRANTED. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(a) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1, Civil Case No. 10-cv-00400-PAB-MJW is CONSOLIDATED with Civil Case No. 09-cv-0039 7-REB-MEH for all purposes. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1, Civil Case No. 10-cv-00400-PAB-MJW is REASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Michael Hegarty. By 03/10/2010, plaintiff in Civil Case No. 10-cv-00400 SHALL FILE either a written notice of joinder i n Plaintiffs Opposition to The Boeing Companys Motion To Certify Order Denying Motion To Dismiss for Interlocutory Appeal (Dkt. No. 56) 70 filed 12/14/2009 or, alternatively, a separate response to the motion; provided, furthermore, if plaintiff files a separate response, defendant may file a reply within the time permitted by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1C. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 03/03/2010.(sah, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 09-cv-00397-REB-MEH (Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 09-cv-00398-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00399-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00400-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1064-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1065-REB-MEH, 09-cv-01066REB-MEH, 09-cv-01067-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02208-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02209-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02210-REB-MEH, and 09-cv-02412-REB-MEH) JULIE HART, Plaintiff, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Civil Case No. 10-cv-00400-PAB-MJW ROBERT P. MALLOY, Plaintiff, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, INC., Defendant. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE Blackburn, J. The matter before me is Defendant's Notice of Related Case and Unopposed Motion To Consolidate [#77] filed March 2, 2010. I grant the motion. As I found in previous orders granting consolidation in this matter, the newly instituted action, Civil Case No. 10-cv-00400-PAB-MJW, Malloy v. The Boeing Company, Inc., implicates questions of law and fact common to those arising in the

cases previously consolidated. (See Order Granting Motion To Consolidate and Denying Motions To Dismiss Without Prejudice [#32] entered June 15, 2009; Order Granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion To Consolidate Related Actions [#49] entered September 28, 2009; Order Granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion To Consolidate Related Actions [#52] entered October 15, 2009.) Consolidation of this action into Civil Case No. 09-cv-00397-REB-MEH, therefore, will be appropriate and efficacious. See FED.R.CIV.P. 42(a); Breaux v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 220 F.R.D. 366, 367 (D. Colo. 2004). THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That Defendant's Notice of Related Case and Unopposed Motion To Consolidate [#77] filed March 2, 2010, is GRANTED; 2. That pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(a) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1, Civil Case No. 10-cv-00400-PAB-MJW is CONSOLIDATED with Civil Case No. 09-cv-00397-REBMEH for all purposes; 3. That pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1, Civil Case No. 10-cv-00400-PABMJW is REASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Michael Hegarty; 4. That all future filings in these consolidated actions shall be captioned as shown below:

2

Civil Case No. 09-cv-00397-REB-MEH (Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 09-cv-00398-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00399-REB-MEH, 09-cv-00400-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1064-REB-MEH, 09-cv-1065-REB-MEH, 09-cv-01066REB-MEH, 09-cv-01067-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02208-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02209-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02210-REB-MEH, 09-cv-02412-REB-MEH, and 10-cv-00400-REB-MEH) JULIE HART, Plaintiff, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, INC., Defendant. and; 5. That by March 10, 2010, plaintiff in Civil Case No. 10-cv-00400 SHALL FILE either a written notice of joinder in Plaintiffs' Opposition to The Boeing Company's Motion To Certify Order Denying Motion To Dismiss for Interlocutory Appeal (Dkt. No. 56) [#70] filed December 14, 2009, or, alternatively, a separate response to the motion; provided, furthermore, if plaintiff files a separate response, defendant may file a reply within the time permitted by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1C. Dated March 3, 2010, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT:

3