Luers v. Astrue
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER), SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 8/13/2009. SS Defendants Brief due by 9/13/2009. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 9/28/2009, by Judge John L. Kane on 7/9/09. (gms, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-00530-AP PAUL A. LUERS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Plaintiff. ______________________________________________________________________________ JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES ______________________________________________________________________________ 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL For Plaintiff: Michael W.Seckar, Esq. 402 W. 12th Street Pueblo, CO 81003 719-543-8636 firstname.lastname@example.org For Defendant: DAVID M. GAOUETTE Acting United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Assistant United States Attorney Debra J. Meachum Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001A Denver, CO 80294 (303) 454-1570 email@example.com
STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. Date Complaint Was Filed: 3/12/09 B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 4/29/09. C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 6/22/09.
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and accurate. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE Neither party intends to submit additional evidence. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe the case raises unusual claims or defenses. 7. OTHER MATTERS The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the court. 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: 8/13/09. B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: 9/13/09. C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 9/28/09. 9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. B. 10. Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.
CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE A. ( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. 2
(X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. 12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED this 9th day of July, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/John L. Kane U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED: For Plaintiff: s/Michael W. Seckar Michael W.Seckar, Esq. 402 W. 12th Street Pueblo, CO 81003 719-543-8636 firstname.lastname@example.org For Defendant: DAVID M. GAOUETTE Acting United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Assistant United States Attorney 1225 Seventeenth Street, Suite 700 Denver, Colorado 80202 s/Debra J. Meachum By: Debra J. Meachum Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1961 Stout Street, Ste. 1001A Denver, Colorado 80294 (303) 844-1570 email@example.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?