Ind v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al

Filing 218

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 211 Defendants CDOCs and Mary Nell McCormicks Motion to Seal Exs. J and L to Motion for Summary Judgment, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 7/9/2013.(ervsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 09-cv-00537-WJM-KLM
JACOB IND,
Plaintiff,
v.
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
MARY NELL MCCORMICK, and
UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES OF CSP AND CDOC,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendants CDOC’s and Mary Nell
McCormick’s Motion to Seal Exs. J and L to Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket
No. 211; Filed June 28, 2013] (the “Motion”). The Motion does not comply with
D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A, which provides as follows:
The Court will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before
filing the motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good faith efforts to
confer with opposing counsel or a pro se party to resolve the disputed matter.
The moving party shall state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the
motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule.
In the Motion, the Moving Defendants claim that counsels’ conferral regarding the
Protective Order [#193] entered in this case satisfies their requirement to confer regarding
the instant Motion. Motion [#211] at 1 n.2. That is not the case. Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#211] is DENIED without prejudice.
Dated: July 9, 2013