Ind v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al

Filing 224

MINUTE ORDER granting 219 Defendants CDOCs and Mary Nell McCormicks Renewed, Unopposed Motion to Seal Exs. J and L to Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to maintain the following documents UNDER RESTRICTION at LEVEL 1: Exhibit J 199 and Exhibit L 200 to Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 7/16/2013.(ervsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-00537-WJM-KLM JACOB IND, Plaintiff, v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARY NELL MCCORMICK, and UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES OF CSP AND CDOC, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Defendants CDOC’s and Mary Nell McCormick’s Renewed, Unopposed Motion to Seal Exs. J and L to Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 219; Filed July 9, 2013] (the “Motion”). In accordance with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2C., the Motion was publicly posted to allow for any objections to the sealing of the documents. No timely objections were filed. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2, the Court finds that the presumption of public access to Court files is outweighed by Defendants’ interest in privacy, and Defendants have shown that a less restrictive alternative is not practicable. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#231] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to maintain the following documents UNDER RESTRICTION at LEVEL 1:1 Exhibit J [#199] and Exhibit L [#200] to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Dated: July 16, 2013 1 Level 1, the least restrictive, limits access to the documents to the parties and the Court. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?