Nichols v. United States of America et al
ORDER denying as premature and unnecessary 51 Plaintiff's Motion for Order Requesting Court to Serve Defendants in Their Individual Capacities by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 7/20/09.(erv, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-00558-CMA-CBS TERRY L. NICHOLS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, JANE DOE, MICHAEL NALLEY, MS. PERRY, RON WILEY, ROD BAUER, DR. LAWRENCE LEYBA, M.D., DR. STEPHEN NAFZIGER, M.D., N. GLADBACH, M.A. KELLAR, M. SCHAPPAUGH, D. SCHIEFELBEIN, UNKNOWN ADX STAFF ACTORS, MR. JONES (DERRICK), DARRON GALL, and KEITH POWLEY, Defendants. ORDER Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer This civil action comes before the court on "Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Court to Serve Defendants in Their Individual Capacities" (filed July 14, 2009 ) (doc. # 51). Pursuant to the Order of Reference dated April 28, 2009 (doc. # 17) and the memorandum dated July 15, 2009 (doc. # 52), this matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge. The court has reviewed the matter, the entire case file, and the 1
applicable law and is sufficiently advised in the premises. As explained in "Defendants' Motion to Extend the Time to Respond to the Complaint and to Set a Consolidated Response Date," if representation requests to the Department of Justice are approved, "it is anticipated that undersigned defense counsel will represent [Defendants] in their individual capacity. . . ." (See doc. # 40 at p. 3 of 6). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that "Plaintiff's Motion Requesting Court to Serve Defendants in Their Individual Capacities" (filed July 14, 2009 ) (doc. # 51) is DENIED as premature and unnecessary. DATED at Denver, Colorado this 20th day of July, 2009. BY THE COURT:
s/ Craig B. Shaffer United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?