McWethy v. City of Colorado Springs et al

Filing 61

MINUTE ORDER granting 59 Plaintiff's Stipulated Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 3/12/2010. Dispositive Motions due by 4/12/2010. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/3/2010 09:45 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/15/2009. (mehcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-00564-WDM-MEH LESLIE McWETHY, individually and as parent and next friend of minor Jordan Thomas McWethy, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, d/b/a MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, GEORGE L. HERTNER, M.D., GREGORY P. COLLINS, D.O., and JAMES K. WARREN, M.D., Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on September 15, 2009. Plaintiff's Stipulated Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order [filed September 11, 2009; docket #59] is granted. For good cause shown, the Scheduling Order shall be amended as follows: a. b. c. d. Deadline for Joinder of Parties and Amendment of Pleadings: October 15, 2009 Discovery Cut-Off: March 12, 2010 Dispositive Motion Deadline: April 12, 2010 Expert Witness Disclosure: (4) Plaintiff shall designate all experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2) on or before December 17, 2009. (5) Defendants shall designate all experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2) on or before January 18, 2010. (6) The parties shall designate all rebuttal experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2) on or before February 17, 2010. f. Interrogatory Schedule: All parties agree to propound interrogatories on or before February 9, 2010. g. Schedule for Request for Production of Documents: All parties agree to propound requests for production on or before February 9, 2010. In addition, the Final Pretrial Conference scheduled in this case for June 14, 2010 at 9:30 a.m. is hereby vacated and rescheduled to August 3, 2010, at 9:45 a.m. in Courtroom 203 on the second floor of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties shall submit their proposed pretrial order, pursuant to District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing ("ECF") Procedures V.L. no later than five (5) business days prior to the pretrial conference. The proposed pretrial order to be submitted to the Magistrate Judge under the ECF Procedures must be submitted in a useable format (i.e., WordPerfect or Word only) and shall be emailed to the Magistrate Judge at Hegarty_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov. Attorneys and/or pro se parties not participating in ECF shall submit their proposed pretrial order on paper to the Clerk's Office. However, if any party in this case is participating in ECF, it is the responsibility of that party to submit the proposed pretrial order pursuant to the District of Colorado ECF Procedures. The parties shall prepare the proposed pretrial order in accordance with the form which may be downloaded in richtext format from the forms section of the court's website at www.co.uscourts.gov. Instructions for downloading in richtext format are posted in the forms section of the website. All out-of-state counsel shall comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 83.3C prior to the pretrial conference. The parties are further advised that they shall not assume that the court will grant the relief requested in any motion. Failure to appear at a court-ordered conference or to comply with a courtordered deadline which has not be vacated by court order may result in the imposition of sanctions. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse will be required to show a valid photo identification. See D.C. Colo. LCivR 83.2B. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?