Gomez v. Dillon Companies

Filing 30

MINUTE ORDER striking 23 Plaintiffs Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/14/2009.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-00676-REB-KLM LAURA GOMEZ, Plaintiff, v. DILLON COMPANIES, INC., doing business as King Soopers, Inc., a Kansas corproation, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum [Docket No. 23; Filed August 3, 2009] (the "Motion"). In a previous Order [Docket No. 29; Filed September 17, 2009] the Court noted that the filing of the Motion is a clear violation of the Court's rules and instructions. The Order Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference [Docket No. 4; Filed April 6, 2009] states that "[n]o opposed discovery motions are to be filed with the Court until the parties comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR. 7.1(A). If the parties are unable to reach agreement on a discovery issue after conferring, they shall arrange a conference call with Magistrate Judge Mix to attempt to resolve the issue. Both of these steps must be completed before any contested discovery motions are filed with the Court ...." Moreover, the Scheduling Order, which was signed by counsel and the Court, contains the same instructions [Docket No. 15; Filed June 3, 2009]. On September 17, 2009, the Court ordered that counsel contact chambers, via a conference call, to set a date and time for a telephonic hearing on the pending discovery dispute. The parties have not done so. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum [Docket No. 23] is STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Court's orders. Dated: October 14, 2009

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?