Adam Aircraft Industries, Inc. et al v. M&M Aerospace Hardware, Inc.

Filing 9

ORDER denying 1 Defendant M&M Aerospace Hardware, Inc.'s Motion to Withdraw Reference, by Judge John L. Kane on 4/13/09.(gms, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge John L. Kane Civil Action No. 09-cv-690-AP In re: ADAM AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, INC., Debtor. JEFFREY A. WEINMAN, as Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. M&M AEROSPACE HARDWARE, INC., a/k/a B/E Aerospace Company, Defendant. ORDER Kane, J. This matter is before the court on Defendant M&M Aerospace Hardware, Inc.'s, Motion for Withdrawal of Reference. The motion is DENIED. No cause exists to withdraw the reference under 28 U.S.C. § 157(d). The Defendant filed its motion to withdraw the reference weeks after the Trustee filed a motion to strike the jury demand and it waited more than 30 days after filing its jury demand to seek the withdrawal. While I do not hold that in all cases, a strict application of Stainer v. Latimer (In re Latimer), 918 F.2d 136 (10th Circ. 1990) requires that the demand for jury trial must be filed simultaneously with a request to transfer to the district court, the holding is clear that the two must be filed in combination. Here, there is no such combination. Providing for transfer is such a stuttered fashion in the absence of compelling discrete reasons for delay is not in the interests of an efficient and just administration of the Bankruptcy Court's business. Dated: April 13, 2009 BY THE COURT: S/John L. Kane John L. Kane, Senior Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?