Devoe v. Broaddus et al

Filing 132

MINUTE ORDER: denying as moot 127 the Defendants Daniel Petersen, R.N.s and Supplemental Health Cares Motion for Preservation Deposition of Plaintiff. The hearing set for March 16, 2010, is VACATED, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/12/10.(bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-00711-PAB-BNB DEBRA KAY DEVOE, Plaintiff, v. MARK BROADDUS, in his individual capacity as Warden, SUSAN ROBERTS, in her individual capacity as PA/NP/RD, SERGEANT CHERIE SANCHEZ, in her individual capacity, SERGEANT TOU LO, in his individual capacity, PATRICK POLLEY, in his individual capacity, ABEL RAZO, in his individual capacity, ROXANNE BARCA, in her individual capacity, MUSHAFAU KUKOYI, in his individual capacity, DANTE BLANTON, in his individual capacity, PAMELA DANIELLE, in her individual capacity, DANIEL SULLIVAN, in her individual capacity, CHANTAY BANKS, in her individual capacity, PER DIEM MEDICAL STAFFING, INC., DANIEL PETERSEN, R.N., in his individual capacity, JENNIFER COUNTRYMAN-TRUJILLO, in her individual capacity as RN, YVETTE MARTINEZ-HOCHBERG, M.D., in her individual capacity as Physician, and SUPPLEMENTAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES LIMITED INC., d/b/a Supplemental Health Care, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ Minute Order Entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Pursuant to plaintiff's filing of her response [docket no. 131] to the defendants' Motion for Preservation Deposition [docket no. 127], IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants Daniel Petersen, R.N.'s and Supplemental Health Care's Motion for Preservation Deposition of Plaintiff [docket no. 127, filed February 25, 2010] is DENIED AS MOOT, and the hearing set for March 16, 2010, is VACATED. DATED: March 12, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?