American Family Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. v. Denver Haslam et al

Filing 585

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Motion Hearing held on 4/24/2012, denying 581 Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Order on American Family's Motion for Protective Order Re: Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) Deposition of American Family filed by Defendants OneWest Bank and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. (FTR: C. Coomes -- Courtroom A-501) (mehcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL E. HEGARTY Civil Action No. 09-cv-00724-DME-MEH Courtroom Deputy: Cathy Coomes Date: April 24, 2012 FTR – Courtroom A501 AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY INC., Kathleen Chaney Plaintiff, vs. DENVER HASLAM, COMMERCIAL CAPITAL, INC., MIKEL MEWBOURN, M&B DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC., FALL RIVER VILLAGE COMMUNITIES, LLC, ONEWEST BANK, FSB, and DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, and MERITPLAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Michael Carrigan John Morning Defendants, v. JAMES T. MARKUS, John Young Cross Claimant. ADLFINGER INSURANCE AGENCY, Interested Party. COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER MOTION HEARING Court in session: 11:03 a.m. Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Discussion regarding Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Order on American Family’s Motion for Protective Order Re: Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) Deposition of American Family filed by Defendants OneWest Bank and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (Doc. #581, filed 4/23/12). ORDERED: For reasons stated on the record, Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Order on American Family’s Motion for Protective Order Re: Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) Deposition of American Family filed by Defendants OneWest Bank and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (Doc. #581, filed 4/23/12) is DENIED. Court in recess: 11:12 a.m. (Hearing concluded) Total time in court: 0:09

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?