Mishkin et al v. Zynex, Inc. et al
Filing
113
ORDER granting 112 Lead Plaintiffs' Motion for Distribution of Class Settlement Fund. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/26/13. (kfinn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 09-cv-00780-REB-KLM
(Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 09-cv-00816-REB-KLM and 09-cv-00829REB-KLM)
MARJORIE MISHKIN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly
Situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
ZYNEX, INC., f/k/a ZYNEX MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC.,
THOMAS SANDGAARD and
FRITZ G. ALLISON,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING LEAD PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
FOR DISTRIBUTION OF CLASS SETTLEMENT FUND
Blackburn, J.
This matter is before me on the Lead Plaintiffs’ Motion for Distribution of
Class Settlement Fund [#112]1 filed January 13, 2013. No response or objection to
the motion has been filed. I grant the motion.
WHEREAS Lead Plaintiffs John Trommald, Heather Trommald and Howard
Makler on behalf of the Settlement Class, have moved this Court pursuant to Rule 23 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for an Order: (1) approving the administrative
determinations of Class Action Administration, Inc. (“CAA”) accepting and rejecting
claims submitted herein; (2) directing distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, after
1
“[#112]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
deduction of the payments requested herein, to Class Members whose Proofs of Claim
have been accepted; (3) authorizing the destruction of paper copies of Proof of Claim
forms one year after distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, and authorizing the
destruction of electronic copies of claim records three years after distribution of the Net
Settlement Fund; and (4) authorizing any undistributed funds that cannot be otherwise
reallocated to be donated to Colorado Legal Services; and (5) for such other and further
relief as may be just and proper, and good cause appearing therefor,
On due consideration of the application, the Court hereby orders as follows.
1. This Order incorporates by reference the definitions in the Stipulation of
Settlement, and all capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meaning as set
forth in the Stipulation of Settlement.
2. The Motion is granted in its entirety, and the Court approves the
determinations of CAA, the Claims Administrator, accepting claims, including the late
but otherwise eligible Proofs of Claim, as set forth in the Affidavit of Matthew Pohl
[#112-2].
3. The Net Settlement Fund established by the Settlement of this Class Action
shall be distributed to Class Members who had submitted valid Claim Forms according
to the determinations of CAA and consistent with the Plan of Allocation previously
approved by the Court.
4. Rejected or otherwise ineligible Proofs of Claim are hereby rejected.
5. The Court bars the acceptance of claims received on or after January 31,
2013.
6. To the extent any funds remain undistributed because checks are not cashed
or for any other reason, and reallocation to Class Members whose claims have been
2
accepted is not equitable and practical, Plaintiffs’ Co-Lead Counsel is directed to
distribute the uncashed balance to Colorado Legal Services, a non-profit corporation,
which assists persons with low-income and seniors with legal matters throughout the
State of Colorado.
7. One year after initial distribution of the Net Settlement Consideration, CAA
may destroy any paper copies of the Proof of Claim forms and all related
documentation, and three years after final distribution of the Net Settlement
Consideration, it may destroy electronic copies of the same.
8. The Lead Plaintiffs’ Motion for Distribution of Class Settlement Fund
[#112] filed January 13, 2013, is GRANTED.
Dated February 26, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?