Tara Woods Limited Partnership v. Fannie Mae et al

Filing 169

Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Motions Hearing held on 7/2/2010, denying 150 Plaintiff's Amended Motion to Strike the Number of Defendants' Expert Witnesses that Exceed the Limitation Allowed in the Scheduling Order. As to 153 Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Compel Discovery of Claimed Privileged Information Based Upon the Crime/Fraud Exception, Defendants' response is due by 7/12/2010; Plaintiff's reply is due by 7/27/2010. As to 161 Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel Discovery, briefs shall be filed in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Court Reporter FTR - C. Coomes) (mehcd)

Download PDF
-MEH Tara Woods Limited Partnership v. Fannie Mae et al Doc. 169 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL E. HEGARTY Civil Action No. 09-cv-00832-MSK-MEH Courtroom Deputy: Cathy Coomes TARA WOODS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Date: July 2, 2010 FTR ­ Courtroom C203 Angela L. Ekker Plaintiff, vs. FANNIE MAE and EICHLER, FAYNE & ASSOCIATES, Defendants. COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER MOTIONS HEARING Court in session: 10:19 a.m. Frank Visciano Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Discussion regarding the status of the case, Plaintiff's Amended Motion to Strike the Number of Defendants' Expert Witnesses that Exceed the Limitation Allowed in the Scheduling Order (Doc. #150, filed 6/15/10), setting a briefing schedule on the other motions set for hearing today, and an in camera inspection of privileged documents. ORDERED: 1. For reasons stated on the record, Plaintiff's Amended Motion to Strike the Number of Defendants' Expert Witnesses that Exceed the Limitation Allowed in the Scheduling Order (Doc. #150, filed 6/15/10) is DENIED. As to Plaintiff's Motion for Order Compelling Discovery of Claimed Privileged Information Based on the Crime/Fraud Exception (Doc. #153, filed 6/15/10), Defendants shall file a response on or before July 12, 2010. Plaintiff shall file a reply on or before July 27, 2010. As to Plaintiff's Second Motion for an Order Compelling Discovery (Doc. #161, filed 6/25/10), counsel shall file their briefs in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2. 3. Dockets.Justia.com Discussion regarding the pending Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's request for an extension of time to file a response. Ms. Ekker is directed to file a written motion with the Court requesting an extension. Court in recess: 11:04 a.m. (Hearing concluded) Total time in court: 0:45

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?