Wightman v. Cessna Aircraft Company

Filing 23

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO CONSOLIDATE. Cessna Aircraft Companys Motion To Consolidate [ 106] filed 05/04/2009, is GRANTED. Cessna Aircraft Companys Motion To Consolidate 107 filed 06/02/2009, is GRANTED. Under FED. R. CIV. P. 42(a)(2), and D.C.COLO .LCivR 42.1, Civil Action No. 09-cv-00835-CMA-MEH, Jean M. Wightman, personal representative of the estate of Jeffrey M. Wightman v. Cessna Aircraft Company is CONSOLIDATED with Civil Action No. 07-cv-00968-REB-CBS for all purposes. Under FED. R. CIV . P. 42(a)(2), and D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1, Civil Action No. 09-cv-01145-MSK-MEH, Catherine S. Walton, personal representative of the estate of Bruce Walton v. Cessna Aircraft Company is CONSOLIDATED with Civil Action No. 07-cv-00968-REB-CBS for all purposes. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 09/16/2009 (sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 07-cv-00968-REB-CBS (Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 07-cv-00971-REB-CBS, 07-cv-01087-REB-CBS, and 08-cv-02437-REB-CBS) TRUDIE M. ISKOWITZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-cv-00835-CMA-MEH JEAN M. WIGHTMAN, Personal Representative of the Estate of Jeffrey S. Wightman, Plaintiff, v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY, Defendants. Civil Action No. 09-cv-01145-MSK-MEH CATHERINE S. WALTON, Personal Representative of the Estate of Bruce Walton, Plaintiff, v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO CONSOLIDATE Blackburn, J. This matter is before me on the following motions: (1) Cessna Aircraft Company's Motion To Consolidate [#106] filed May 4, 2009; and (2) Cessna Aircraft Company's Motion To Consolidate [#107] filed June 2, 2009. I grant the motions. Cessna seeks to consolidate two cases with the other cases consolidated under Civil Action No. 07-cv-00968-REB-CBS. The two cases at issue in the present motions are (1) Civil Action No. 09-cv-00835-CMA-MEH, Jean M. Wightman, personal representative of the estate of Jeffrey M. Wightman v. Cessna Aircraft Company; and (2) Civil Action No. 09-cv-01145-MSK-MEH, Catherine S. Walton, personal representative of the estate of Bruce Walton v. Cessna Aircraft Company. As required by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1, counsel for Cessna has contacted the other parties to determine if they oppose the relief sought by Cessna. Except for plaintiff Nina Winston, none of the other parties oppose Cessna's motions. Winston opposes the motion to consolidate 09-cv-00835 for the same reasons she has stated in opposition to previous motions to consolidate. Previously, I have concluded that Winston's stated reasons for her opposition to consolidation are not sufficient to defeat consolidation. Order Granting Motion To Consolidate [#40] filed January 3, 2008. All of the above-captioned cases arise from the crash of a Cessna Citation business jet near Pueblo, Colorado, on February 16, 2005. Two pilots and six passengers were killed in the crash. Under FED. R. CIV. P. 42(a), the court may consolidate cases involving common questions of law or fact. Common questions of law and fact are predominant in the above-captioned cases. To the extent any of these 2 cases involves issues unique to a particular case, proceedings can be adjusted readily to resolve those unique issues. Thus, the motions to consolidate should be granted. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That Cessna Aircraft Company's Motion To Consolidate [#106] filed May 4, 2009, is GRANTED; 2. That Cessna Aircraft Company's Motion To Consolidate [#107] filed June 2, 2009, is GRANTED; 3. That under FED. R. CIV. P. 42(a)(2), and D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1, Civil Action No. 09-cv-00835-CMA-MEH, Jean M. Wightman, personal representative of the estate of Jeffrey M. Wightman v. Cessna Aircraft Company is CONSOLIDATED with Civil Action No. 07-cv-00968-REB-CBS for all purposes; 4. That under FED. R. CIV. P. 42(a)(2), and D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1, Civil Action No. 09-cv-01145-MSK-MEH, Catherine S. Walton, personal representative of the estate of Bruce Walton v. Cessna Aircraft Company is CONSOLIDATED with Civil Action No. 07-cv-00968-REB-CBS for all purposes; 5. That under D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1, Civil Action No. 09-cv-00835-CMA-MEH IS REASSIGNED to this court and to Magistrate Judge Shaffer; 6. That under D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1, Civil Action No. 09-cv-01145-MSK-MEH IS REASSIGNED to this court and to Magistrate Judge Shaffer; 3 7. That the these consolidated actions SHALL be captioned as follows: Civil Action No. 07-cv-00968-REB-CBS (Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 07-cv-00971-REB-CBS, 07-cv-01087-REBCBS, 08-cv-02298-REB-CBS, 08-cv-02437-REB-CBS, 09-cv-00835-REB-CBS, and 09-cv-01145-REB-CBS) TRUDIE M. ISKOWITZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Dated September 16, 2009, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?