Fraser v. High Mountain Concepts, LLC

Filing 40

ORDER. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, this case is REOPENED. The Notice of Settlement Payment and Request for Dismissal 39 , filed 08/06/2010, is ACCEPTED and APPROVED. The request for dismissal is GRANTED. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 08/09/2010. (sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 09-cv-00842-REB-MEH SCOTT FRASER, an individual, Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant, v. HIGH MOUNTAIN CONCEPTS, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, Defendant and Counterclaimant. ORDER Blackburn, J. The matter comes before me on the Parties' Notice of Settlement Payment and Request for Dismissal [#39], filed August 6, 2010. This notice is filed pursuant to my Order [#38] entered January 5, 2010. See Order at 1, ¶ 1. Pursuant to that same order, the case was closed administratively. See Order at 2, ¶ 5. After careful review of the notice and the file, I conclude that the case should be reopened, that the notice should be approved, and that the case should be dismissed with prejudice. IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, this case is REOPENED; 2. That the Notice of Settlement Payment and Request for Dismissal [#39], filed August 6, 2010, is ACCEPTED and APPROVED; 3. That the request for dismissal is GRANTED; and 4. That this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs. Dated August 9, 2010, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?