Honeywell International Inc. v. Shanghai Pegasus Materials Co., LTD et al
ORDER SETTING HEARING UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 16: Hearing set for 4/29/2010 01:30 PM in Courtroom A 701 before Judge Philip A. Brimmer, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/25/10. (ebs, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 09-cv-00847-PAB-CBS HONEYW ELL INTERNATIONAL INC., Plaintiff, v. SHANGHAI PEGASUS MATERIALS CO., LTD, a Chinese company, and DA-TEC INDUSTRY LTD, a Chinese company, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER SETTING HEARING UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 16 _____________________________________________________________________ This matter comes before the Court upon a Complaint filed by the Plaintiff alleging the infringement of a patent. In light thereof, a hearing pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 is appropriate. It is ORDERED: 1. That a hearing is set for April 29, 2010 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom A701 at
the United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Counsel shall bring their calendars. This is not a scheduling conference. The parties should not submit a proposed scheduling order. 2. That prior to the hearing, the parties shall meet and confer about the
following issues and be prepared to address them at the hearing: · · W hether there are issues of claim construction. W hether a hearing will be required under Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370 (1996).
If a Markman hearing is required, whether discovery is necessary prior to such hearing. If so, what discovery is required. (This hearing does not substitute for a scheduling conference before the Magistrate Judge.) W hether there are any other issues or impediments to the setting of a Markman hearing. Other appropriate issues enumerated in Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(c).
DATED February 25, 2010. BY THE COURT:
s/Philip A. Brimmer PHILIP A. BRIMMER United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?