Santoyo v. Leprino Foods
SECOND AMENDED ORDER re: 58 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer. Entered by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 9/2/10. (wydcd, rrk) (Modified on 9/2/2010 to add Second Amended to the title of the text)(erv2, ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel Civil Action No. 09-cv-00908-WYD-CBS GLORIA HUIZAR, Plaintiff, v. RUBEN ESTRADA; and LEPRINO FOODS, Defendants. SECOND AMENDED ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) through (C), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b), and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.1C, United States Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer is designated to conduct proceedings in this civil action as follows: (X) (X) Convene a scheduling conference under Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2. Conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause. Convene such settlement conferences and directly related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case. Hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions.
(X) (X) ()
Conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order.
IT IS ORDERED that this civil action is referred to the named magistrate judge to proceed according to the designations marked (X) above. It is further ORDERED that parties and counsel shall be familiar and comply with the above judge's requirements found at www.cod.uscourts.gov. Dated this 2nd day of September, 2010. BY THE COURT:
s/ Wiley Y. Daniel WILEY Y. DANIEL, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?