Schwartz et al v. Booker et al

Filing 19

MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion to Stay of the Briefing Schedule Pertaining to Defendants Motion to Dismiss and for an Extension of Time Within Which to Respond to Defendants Motions. Plaintiffs shall respond to Defendan ts Motions to Dismiss 9 , 10 , filed May 11, 2009, not later than Monday, June 29, 2009. Should a stay of the briefing schedule become necessary due to the resolution of the motion to stay discovery, Plaintiffs may file another motion. by Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 6/1/09.(erv, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-00915-WYD-KMT MELISSA R. SCHWARTZ, as Personal Representative and Administrator fo the Estate of CHANDLER GRAFNER, deceased; CHRISTINA GRAFNER; and JOSHUA NORRIS, Plaintiffs, v. JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; DENVER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; MARGARET BOOKER, in her Individual and Official Capacity; and MARY PEAGLER, in her Individual and Official Capacity, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL Plaintiffs' Request for a Stay of the Briefing Schedule Pertaining to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and for an Extension of Time Within Which to Respond to Defendants['] Motions [doc. #18], filed May 29, 2009, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part WITHOUT PREJUDICE. It is granted insofar as it requests a thirty-day extension of time to respond and denied insofar as it requests a stay of the briefing schedule. A thirty-day extension is appropriate because it accounts for the time necessary for the resolution of Defendants' Joint Motion to Stay Discovery [doc. #15], filed May 28, 2009. Accordingly, Plaintiffs shall respond to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss [doc. ##9, 10], filed May 11, 2009, not later than Monday, June 29, 2009. Should a stay of the briefing schedule become necessary due to the resolution of the motion to stay discovery, Plaintiffs may file another motion. Dated: June 1, 2009