Home Design Services, Inc. v. C & H Builders, LLC et al

Filing 79

ORDER re: 77 Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. The proposed Amended Scheduling Order be resubmitted in proper form by 06/11/2010. The resubmitted proposed Amended Scheduling Order shall contain a Settlement Conference date of 10/18/2010 with Confidential Settlement Statements to be filed with this Court on or before 10/11/2010. All other dates are hereby approved, by Magistrate Judge Laird T. Milburn on 05/27/2010.(wjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO U.S. Magistrate Judge Laird T. Milburn Civil Action No. 09-cv-00931-MSK-LTM HOME DESIGN SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, vs. C & H BUILDERS, LLC, SJODEN WOOD DESIGNS, LLC, CHRIS SJODEN, JERRY W. PETERS, individually and d/b/a J.W. DESIGN, DONALD G. WALKER, TERESA S. WALKER, DAVID P. SMITH, and JANELYN M. SMITH, Defendants. ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER (docket # 77) The Court has received and reviewed Defendants' Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order (docket # 77) dated May 24, 2010 and, although inclined to approve it, FINDS that its format is inappropriate because it does not conform to the format approved by this Court in this case (see scheduling order dated July 21, 2009 (docket # 20) entered by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya). Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that the proposed Amended Scheduling Order be resubmitted in proper form by June 11, 2010. The resubmitted proposed Amended Scheduling Order shall contain a Settlement Conference date of Monday October 18, 2010 with Confidential Settlement Statements to be filed with this Court on or before October 11, 2010. All other dates in the Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order (docket # 77) are hereby approved. DATED at Grand Junction, Colorado, this 27th day of May, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/Laird T. Milburn __________________________________ Laird T. Milburn United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?