Tennille v. Western Union Company, The

Filing 139

MINUTE ENTRY for Oral Argument Hearing held before Judge John L. Kane held on 11/21/2011. Denying 56 Motion to Compel. ORDERED: Existing STAY of non-arbitration related discovery is REOPENED. ORDERED: The Parties shall meet and confer and submit an amended scheduling order, as specified. (Court Reporter: Tracy Weir)(babia)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO SENIOR JUDGE JOHN L. KANE Courtroom Deputy: Bernique Abiakam Court Reporter: Tracy Weir Date: November 21, 2011 Civil Action No.: 09-cv-00938-JLK-KMT (consolidated with 10-cv-00765-JLK-KMT) Counsel: Parties: JAMES P. TENNILLE, et al., Richard J. Burke Seth A. Katz Jonathan N. Shub Plaintiffs, v. THE WESTERN UNION COMPANY, et al., Jason A. Yurasek Defendants. COURTROOM MINUTES Oral Argument 10:04 a.m Court in session. Court calls case. Counsel present. Argument to be heard regarding Doc. No. 56. Preliminary remarks by the Court. 10:07 a.m. Argument by Mr. Yurasek. 10:44 a.m. Court in recess. 10:55 a.m. Court in session. 10:56 a.m. Rebuttal argument by Mr. Burke. 09-cv-00938-JLK-KMT (consolidated with 10-cv-00765-JLK-KMT) Oral Argument November 21, 2011 11:19 a.m. Further argument by Mr. Yurasek. 11:27 a.m. Comments and rulings by the Court. ORDERED: Defendant Western Union Financial Services, Inc.’s Motion To Compel Arbitration And Stay Proceedings Pending Arbitration (Filed 6/7/11; Doc. No. 56) is DENIED. ORDERED: The existing STAY of non-arbitration related to discovery is REOPENED. ORDERED: The parties shall meet and confer and submit an amended scheduling order setting a schedule for the completion of class action and merit based discovery, dispositive motion deadline, and expert witnesses, as specified. 11:42 a.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total time in court: 1 hour 32 minutes. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?