Tennille v. Western Union Company, The
Filing
209
ORDER re: June 14, 2013 Final Approval Hearing by Judge John L. Kane on 05/21/13. (jjhsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge John L. Kane
Civil Action No. 09-cv-00938-JLK-KMT (consolidated with No. 10-cv-00765-JLK)
JAMES P. TENILLE, ROBERT SMET, ADELAIDA DELEON and YAMILET
RODRIGUEZ, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THE WESTERN UNION COMPANY and WESTERN UNION FINANCIAL SERVICES,
INC.,
Defendants.
ORDER
Kane, J.
A conflict in the Court’s schedule has arisen since the selection of June 14, 2013 for the
Final Approval hearing in this case. Given the nature of the hearing and the logistics involved in
setting it, I am reluctant to move it and have asked my colleague, former Chief and now Senior
Judge Richard P. Matsch of this District, to take the hearing. He has graciously agreed to do so.
I am notifying the parties and counsel of the change so that any questions or concerns they may
have may be raised and addressed before the hearing.
The parties may count on the fact that Judge Matsch will be fully apprised of the facts
and history of this litigation and will be ready to address any issues that arise at the Final
Approval hearing. These issues will not include the questions of class representative incentive
awards or attorney fees and expenses, both of which, in accord with Sections 4 and 5 of the
1
parties’ Stipulation (Doc. 172-2), will be decided separately and independently of the
determination of whether to approve the settlement. Judge Matsch will be prepared to address
the proposed cy pres fund (Section 6 of the Stipulation) and to resolve any issues related the
parties’ joint recommendation regarding the nature and management of that fund.
Dated: May 21, 2013.
/s John L. Kane
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?