Tennille v. Western Union Company, The
Filing
355
MINUTE ENTRY for Oral Argument Hearing proceedings held before Judge John L. Kane on 9/3/2014. Taking under advisement 195 Motion for Attorney Fees. ORDERED: Additional filings due on or before September 17, 2014. Court Reporter: Kara Spitler. (babia)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior Judge John L. Kane
Date: September 3, 2014
Deputy Clerk: Bernique Abiakam
Court Reporter: Kara Spitler
Civil Action No.: 09-cv-00938-JLK (consolidated with Civil Action No. 10-cv-00765-JLK)
JAMES P. TENNILLE,
ROBERT SMET,
ADELAIDA DELEON,
and YAMILET RODRIGUEZ,
individually and on behalf of all other similarly
situated,
Richard Joseph Burke
Mitchell Baker
Plaintiffs,
v.
THE WESTERN UNION COMPANY,
and WESTERN UNION FINANCIAL
SERVICES, INC.,
Jason A. Yurasek
Jess A. Dance
Defendants.
COURTROOM MINUTES
Oral Argument Hearing
10:07 a.m.
Court in session.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Also present, David Fallek client
representative for Defendant; Paul Dorsey, Objector, and Paul Rothstein, representing
N. Albert Bacharach, Jr., Objector.
Preliminary remarks by the Court.
Document No. 354, read by the Court.
Argument heard regarding Doc. No. 195.
09-cv-00938-JLK
Oral Argument
September 3, 2014
10:13 a.m.
Argument by Mr. Burke.
10:49 a.m.
Statement by Mr. Rothstein.
10:50 a.m.
Statement by Mr. Dorsey.
ORDERED: Any additional filings must be received on or before September 17,
2014.
11:01 a.m.
Argument by Mr. Yurasek. Comments and questions by the Court.
11:24 a.m.
Rebuttal argument by Mr. Burke.
11:29 a.m.
Comments by the court.
ORDERED: Plaintiffs’ Motion Of Class Counsel For Approval Of Attorneys’ Fees,
Costs And Expenses And For Approval Of Incentive Awards (Filed
4/30/13; Doc. No. 195) is taken UNDER ADVISEMENT.
11:30 a.m. Court in recess.
Hearing concluded.
Time in court - 01:23
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?