Predator International, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc.

Filing 357

MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 355 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a 30-page motion. Plaintiff's post-judgment motion 356 is STRICKEN. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 7/26/12.(pabsec)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-00970-PAB-KMT PREDATOR INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff, v. GAMO OUTDOOR USA, INC., a Florida corporation, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for leave to file excess pages [Docket No. 355] for its motion seeking, among other things, relief pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) [Docket No. 356]. Pursuant to § III.A of this Court’s Practice Standards, such a motion may not exceed fifteen pages unless plaintiff can show good cause. Plaintiff seeks to file a 43-page motion, but fails to show good cause. A review of the motion, which plaintiff has already filed, see Docket No. 356, shows it to be repetitive and unduly verbose. For example, the argument section of the motion does not begin until page 16. Moreover, plaintiff devotes nearly two pages to a quote from a single case. See Docket No. 356 at 33-34. The page limits in the Court’s Practice Standards are designed to deter motions of this type, which make no reasoned attempt to separate the wheat from the chaff. The Court will, however, allow plaintiff to file a 30page motion. Wherefore, it is ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for leave to file excess pages [Docket No. 355] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a 30-page motion. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff’s post-judgment motion [Docket No. 356] is STRICKEN. DATED July 26, 2012.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?