Gibson v. Campbell et al

Filing 264

MINUTE ORDER. ORDERED that the Notices, filed as motions, 260 and 262 are DENIED. The deadline for Plaintiff's response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment remains set at February 15, 2012. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail an additional copy of the Motion for Summary Judgment located at Docket No. 236, in addition to a copy of this Minute Order, to Plaintiff at the address listed on the docket by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 01/19/12.(jjh, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 09-00983-WYD-KLM
WELLMAN E. GIBSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
ANNA MARIE CAMPBELL,
C. HOLST, AIC,
SHIRLEY STEINBECK,
MARSHALL GRIFFITH,
LT. STEINBECK, and
DOCTOR ASSEN,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s “Notice to Court” [Docket No. 260;
Filed January 17, 2012] and “Notice to the Court Extension for Cause Request” [Docket
No. 262; Filed January 19, 2012]. Both documents were filed by the Clerk’s Office as
motions. Plaintiff states that he has not been able to access his legal files since October
2011; however, the record belies this assertion. Plaintiff has submitted filings regularly
throughout the duration of this lawsuit, including filings on October 5, October 31,
November 10, November 16, November 18, December 2, December 19, and December
30, 2011, as well as on January 6, January 17, and January 19, 2012.
Further, on December 27, 2011 [#254], the Court issued a Minute Order directing
Plaintiff to respond to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [#236] on or before
February 15, 2012, which is three months from the date when Defendants filed their Motion
for Summary Judgment. The Court emphasized that this was ample time for Plaintiff to
write and file a response, and no further extensions of time would be permitted. In the
motions at issue, Plaintiff presents no compelling reason to modify the December 27, 2011
Minute Order. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Notices, filed as motions, are DENIED. The
deadline for Plaintiff’s response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment remains set
at February 15, 2012.
1

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail an additional copy of the Motion for Summary
Judgment located at Docket No. 236, in addition to a copy of this Minute Order, to Plaintiff
at the address listed on the docket.
Dated: January 19, 2012

2