Gibson v. Campbell et al

Filing 306

MINUTE ORDER granting 304 Motion requesting clarification of orders received 5-3-12 5-11-12 & 5-14-12 & notice to court of objection to use of old ADA standard. This case is also now included on the list of pro se cases available for volunteer counsel, maintained by the Clerk of Court by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 05/22/12.(jjhsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 09-00983-WYD-KLM
WELLMAN E. GIBSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
ANNA MARIE CAMPBELL,
C. HOLST, AIC,
SHIRLEY STEINBECK,
MARSHALL GRIFFITH,
LT. STEINBECK, and
DOCTOR ASSEN,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s “Motion requesting clarification of
orders received 5-3-12 5-11-12 & 5-14-12 & notice to court of objection to use of old
ADA standard” [Docket No. 304; Filed May 21, 2012] (the “Motion”).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED as follows. There are
presently two Recommendations pending in this case: (1) the Recommendation issued May
3, 2012 [#293], recommending that Plaintiff’s “Request Permission to File Supplemental
Pleading for Retaliation by DOC” [Docket No. 289; Filed May 1, 2012]; Plaintiff’s “Request
for a Court Order to Prevent Force Feeding of Plaintiff” [Docket No. 290; Filed May 1,
20912]; and Plaintiff’s “Request for Court Order to Receive ADA Exam” [Docket No. 291;
Filed May 1, 2012] be denied, and (2) the Recommendation issued May 14, 2012 [#300],
recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgement [sic] [Docket No. 245; Filed
November 18, 2011] be denied, and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket
No. 236; Filed November 15, 2011] be granted in part and denied in part.
The Recommendation issued May 11, 2012 [#297] was vacated and placed under
restriction by a Minute Order issued May 14, 2012 [#299].

1

The Court has received Plaintiff’s Objections as to the Recommendation pending
at Docket No. 293, but has not received any objection as to the Recommendation pending
at Docket No. 300. The deadline for the filing of any objection as to the Recommendation
pending at Docket No. 300 is May 29, 2012.
This matter is scheduled for a Final Pretrial Conference on July 10, 2012, and the
parties’ proposed Final Pretrial Order is due on or before July 5, 2012. See [#300]. If the
Recommendation at Docket No. 300 is adopted by the District Judge in full, the Final
Pretrial Conference will concern only the portions of Plaintiff’s Claims One and Two brought
pursuant to the ADA.
This case is also now included on the list of pro se cases available for volunteer
counsel, maintained by the Clerk of Court. However, Plaintiff is again warned that
placement on the list frequently does not result in counsel being obtained. If an attorney
does not volunteer to represent Plaintiff, Plaintiff is warned that he must comply with the
scheduled Court dates and Court orders.
Dated: May 22, 2012

2