Gibson v. Campbell et al
Filing
308
MINUTE ORDER denying 294 Notice to the Court of Defendants' Refusal to Provide Medical Records by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 05/29/12.(jjhsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 09-cv-00983-WYD-KLM
WELLMAN E. GIBSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
ANNA MARIE CAMPBELL,
C. HOLST, AIC,
SHIRLEY STEINBECK,
MARSHALL GRIFFITH,
LT. STEINBECK, and
DOCTOR ASSEN,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s “Notice to the Court of Defendants’
Refusal to Provide Medical Records” [Docket No. 294; Filed May 9, 2012] (the “Motion”).
As instructed, Defendants filed a Response to the Motion on May 25, 2012 [#307].
Defendants explain that the Pueblo Forensics Unit is part of the Colorado Mental Health
Institute at Pueblo, which maintains its own patient records independently from the
Colorado correctional facilities. [#307] at 2. Defendants include a letter dated May 24,
2012 with the Response, indicating that Plaintiff has acknowledged receipt of his full
medical file from the correctional facility, and that records from the Pueblo Forensics Unit
are not included in that file, but may be requested directly from the Colorado Mental Health
Institute at Pueblo. See [#307-2]. The letter is signed by a Medical Records Tech at
Plaintiff’s place of incarceration, and in the letter, the Tech offers to go through Plaintiff’s
medical records with him.1 Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.
Dated: May 29, 2012
1
The Court notes that the record in this matter indicates that Plaintiff received complete
copies of his medical records on March 28, 2011. See [#197].
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?