Gibson v. Campbell et al

Filing 308

MINUTE ORDER denying 294 Notice to the Court of Defendants' Refusal to Provide Medical Records by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 05/29/12.(jjhsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-00983-WYD-KLM WELLMAN E. GIBSON, Plaintiff, v. ANNA MARIE CAMPBELL, C. HOLST, AIC, SHIRLEY STEINBECK, MARSHALL GRIFFITH, LT. STEINBECK, and DOCTOR ASSEN, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s “Notice to the Court of Defendants’ Refusal to Provide Medical Records” [Docket No. 294; Filed May 9, 2012] (the “Motion”). As instructed, Defendants filed a Response to the Motion on May 25, 2012 [#307]. Defendants explain that the Pueblo Forensics Unit is part of the Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo, which maintains its own patient records independently from the Colorado correctional facilities. [#307] at 2. Defendants include a letter dated May 24, 2012 with the Response, indicating that Plaintiff has acknowledged receipt of his full medical file from the correctional facility, and that records from the Pueblo Forensics Unit are not included in that file, but may be requested directly from the Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo. See [#307-2]. The letter is signed by a Medical Records Tech at Plaintiff’s place of incarceration, and in the letter, the Tech offers to go through Plaintiff’s medical records with him.1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. Dated: May 29, 2012 1 The Court notes that the record in this matter indicates that Plaintiff received complete copies of his medical records on March 28, 2011. See [#197].

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?