Heaney v. Costigan et al
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/28/10. (bnbcd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case No. 09-cv-01006-MSK-BNB Plaintiff: JOHN STEPHEN HEANEY, v. DETECTIVE JAMES COSTIGAN, DETECTIVE MICHAEL CORDOVA, DETECTIVE NOEL IKEDA, OFFICER LUKE PALMITERE, SERGEANT DANIEL STEELE, ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS EMPLOYED BY THE DENVER POLICE DEPARTMENT and, THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER COLORADO, Defendants: ______________________________________________________________________________ PROTECTIVE ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ Each party and each Counsel of Record have stipulated and moved the Court for Protective Order pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure concerning the treatment of Confidential Information (as hereinafter defined), and, therefore, the Court orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED: 1. In this action, at least one of the Parties has sought and/or is seeking Confidential
Information (as defined in paragraph 2 below). The Parties also anticipate seeking additional Confidential Information during discovery and that there will be questioning concerning Confidential Information in the course of depositions. The disclosure of such information
outside the scope of this litigation could result in significant injury to one or more of the Parties' business or privacy interests. 2. "Confidential Information" means any document, file, portions of files,
transcribed testimony, or response to a discovery request, including any extract, abstract, chart, summary, note, or copy made there from not made available to the public and designated by one of the Parties in the manner provided in paragraph 3 below as containing Confidential Information. 3. Where Confidential Information is produced, provided or otherwise disclosed by
a Party in response to any discovery request, it will be designated in the following manner: a. By imprinting the word "Confidential" on the first page or cover of any document produced; b. By imprinting the word "Confidential" next to or above any response to a discovery request; c. During the course of a deposition, by verbally designating testimony to be "Confidential" and subject to the Protective Order; and d. With respect to transcribed testimony, by giving written notice to opposing counsel designating such portions as "Confidential" no later than ten calendar days after receipt of the transcribed testimony. 4. All Confidential Information provided by a Party in response to a discovery
request or transcribed testimony shall be subject to the following restrictions: a. It shall be used only for the purpose of this litigation and not for any business or other purpose whatsoever; 2
b. It shall not be communicated or disclosed by any Party's counsel or a Party in any manner, either directly or indirectly, to anyone except for purposes of this case and unless an affidavit in the form of Exhibit A has been signed. 5. Individuals authorized to review Confidential Information pursuant to this
Protective Order including, but not limited to, the Parties to this action and their undersigned counsel, shall hold Confidential Information in confidence and shall not divulge the Confidential Information, either verbally or in writing, to any other person, entity or government agency unless authorized to do so by court order. 6. The Party's counsel who discloses Confidential Information shall be responsible
for assuring compliance with the terms of this Protective Order with respect to persons to whom such Confidential Information is disclosed and shall retain the original affidavits signed by qualified recipients of Confidential Information and maintain a list of all persons to whom any Confidential Information is disclosed. 7. During the pendency of this action, opposing counsel may upon court order or
agreement of the Parties inspect the list maintained by counsel pursuant to paragraph 6 above upon showing of substantial need in order to establish the source of an unauthorized disclosure of Confidential Information and that opposing counsel are unable to otherwise identify the source of the disclosure. If a Party disagrees with the other party's showing of substantial need, then a party may seek a court order requiring inspection under terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the Court.
No copies of Confidential Information shall be made except by or on behalf of
counsel in this litigation for work product purposes, including for review by experts in this case. Any such copies shall be made and used solely for purposes of this litigation. 9. During pendency of this litigation, counsel shall retain custody of Confidential
Information, and copies made there from pursuant to paragraph 8 above. 10. A party may object to the designation of particular Confidential Information by
giving written notice to the party designating the disputed information within thirty (30) days after production of the information. The written notice shall identify the information to which the objection is made. If the parties cannot resolve the objection within ten (10) business days after the time the notice is received, it shall be the obligation of the party designating the information as confidential to file an appropriate motion requesting that the Court determine whether the disputed information should be subject to the terms of this Protective Order. If such a motion is timely filed, the disputed information shall be treated as confidential under the terms of this Protective Order until the Court rules on the motion. If the designating party fails to file such a motion within the prescribed time, the disputed information shall lose its designation as confidential and shall not thereafter be treated as confidential in accordance with this Protective Order. In connection with a motion filed under this provision, the party designating the information as confidential shall bear the burden of establishing that good cause exists for the disputed information to be treated as confidential. 11. In the event it is necessary for the Parties to file Confidential Information with the
Court in connection with any proceeding or motion, the Confidential Information shall be filed in accordance with the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCiv.R 7.2. and 7.3. 4
The termination of this action shall not relieve counsel or any party or other
persons obligated hereunder from their responsibility to maintain the confidentiality of Confidential Information pursuant to this Protective Order, and the Court shall retain continuing jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this Protective Order, even after this action is terminated. 13. By agreeing to the entry of this Protective Order, the Parties adopt no position as
to the authenticity or admissibility of documents produced subject to it. Neither the taking of any action in accordance with the provisions of this Protective Order, nor the failure to object thereto, shall be construed as a waiver of any claim or defense in this action. 14. Upon termination of this litigation, including any appeals, each Party's counsel
shall immediately return to the producing party all Confidential Information provided subject to this Protective Order. At that time, counsel shall also file under seal with this Court the list of individuals, aside from law office employees, who have received Confidential Information which counsel shall have maintained pursuant to paragraph 6, herein. 15. This Order shall also act as a qualified protective order pursuant to 45 C.F.R.
§ 164.512 (e) regarding any Party's medical records: a. Covered entities are hereby authorized to disclose protected health information related to treatment of the Party connected to the subject matter of this action. This disclosure authority includes records and ex parte interviews. b. Parties are prohibited from using or disclosing the protected health information for any purpose other than this litigation; and
c. Parties are required to return to the covered entity or destroy the protected health information (including all copies made) at the end of this litigation. 16. Nothing in this Protective Order shall preclude any Party from filing a motion
seeking further or different protection from the Court under Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or from filing a motion with respect to the manner in which Confidential Information shall be treated at trial. Dated January 28, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge
AFFIDAVIT STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF ) ) ss )
_____________________________, swears or affirms and states under penalty of perjury: 1. I have read the Protective Order in Civil Action No. 09-cv-01006-MSK-BNB, a copy of which is attached to this Affidavit. 2. I have been informed by ___________________________, Esq., counsel for _______________________________, that the materials described in the list attached to this Affidavit are Confidential Information as defined in the Protective Order. 3. I promise that I have not and will not divulge, or undertake to divulge to any person or recording device any Confidential Information shown or told to me except as authorized in the Protective Order. I will not use the Confidential Information for any purpose other than this litigation. 4. For the purpose of enforcing the terms of the Protective Order, I hereby submit myself to the jurisdiction of the court in the Civil Action referenced above. 5. I will abide by the terms of the Protective Order. _________________________________________ (Signature) _________________________________________ (Print or Type Name) Address: _________________________________________ _________________________________________ Telephone No.: (_____) _____________________ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ______________ day of ___________________________, 2010 by __________________________________. WITNESS my hand and official seal. _____________________________ Notary Public My commission expires:________________ [SEAL] 7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?