Estate of Rosemary Berry v. Berry et al

Filing 60

ORDER. Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Claims Against Defendant Agilent Technologies, Inc. with prejudice 58 is GRANTED. The Plaintiffs claims against Defendant Agilent Technologies, Inc. are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff and Agilent will each pay its own costs and attorneys fees. By Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 04/12/2010.(sah, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior Judge Zita Leeson Weinshienk Civil Action No. 09-cv-01031-ZLW-CBS ESTATE OF ROSEMARY BERRY, deceased, by THERESA BIRD, as personal representative of the ESTATE OF ROSEMARY BERRY, Plaintiff, v. RALPH JAMES BERRY, JR; AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Colorado foreign corporation; and FIDELITY INVESTMENTS INSTITUTIONAL OPERATIONS COMPANY, INC., a Massachusetts corporation, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ This matter comes before the Court upon the Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claims Against Defendant Agilent Technologies, Inc. with prejudice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion and being fully advised in the premises, ORDERS that the Motion is GRANTED. The Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Agilent Technologies, Inc. Are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff and Agilent will each pay its own costs and attorneys' fees.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 12th day of April, 2010. BY THE COURT:

_____________________________ ZITA LEESON WEINSHIENK, Senior Judge United States District Court

2