Nasious v. Mueller et al

Filing 222

MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiffs John Nasious Request to the Court to Apply Liberal Reading to All Plaintiffs Motions and Litigation Attempts 219 is DENIED as moot. By Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/3/2011.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 09–cv–01051–REB–KMT JOHN NASIOUS, Plaintiff, v. CATHIE HOLST, Manager of Correctional Legal Services, ADA Coordinator, AIC CDOC, ADRIENNE JACOBSON, Legal Assistant AIC/ADA Coordinator CDOC, and JOHN DOE AND JANE DOE, all in their individual and official capacities, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA “Plaintiff’s John Nasious Request to the Court to Apply Liberal Reading to All Plaintiff’s Motions and Litigation Attempts” (Doc. No. 219, filed August 3, 2011) is DENIED as moot. Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the court is bound by Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972), to construe his pleadings liberally. Dated: August 3, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?