Berry et al v. Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., The et al

Filing 3

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to the 2 Notice of Dismissal of Claims. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), this matter, and all claims asserted therein, is dismissed without prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys fees and costs, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 9/8/09.(ebs, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action No. 09-cv-01059-PAB ED BEERY, HOLLY CHARTIER, RHONDA ISAACSON, TERRY KIRSCHNER, LESLIE KRONBERG, WENDY LEWIS, STEVE RABKIN, ALAN RICHARDSON, SHERRY SHEPARD-ROSS, and LINDA THARP, Plaintiffs, v. THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC. and PURDUE PHARMA, L.P., Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE _____________________________________________________________________ THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon the Notice of Dismissal of Claims [Docket No. 2]. The Court has reviewed the pleading and is fully advised in the premises. It is ORDERED that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), this matter, and all claims asserted therein, is dismissed without prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. DATED September 8, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/Philip A. Brimmer PHILIP A. BRIMMER United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?