McGee v. TechTarget

Filing 10

MINUTE ORDER striking 8 Plaintiff's Motion to Set Answer Date, for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 6/12/09.(ebs, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-01061-PAB-MEH SHARON MCGEE, Plaintiff, v. TECHTARGET, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on June 12, 2009. Plaintiff's Motion to Set Answer Date [filed June 11, 2009; docket #8] is stricken for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. The parties are reminded of their obligations to comply fully with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. See Hoelzel v. First Select Corp., 214 F.R.D. 634, 636 (D. Colo. 2003) (because Rule 7.1A requires meaningful negotiations by the parties, the rule is not satisfied by one party sending the other party a single email, letter or voicemail).