Creel v. Jahani et al
Filing
78
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND DISMISSING CASE. The Order To Show Cause 76 filed April 59, 2012, is DISCHARGED. Plaintiff's claims against defendants, Sam Jahani, D.O., and Urgent Care, Inc., a Colorado corporation, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/30/12. (mjgsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Case No. 09-cv-01063-REB-KMT
TONYA CREEL,
Plaintiff,
v.
SAM JAHANI, D.O., and
URGENT CARE, INC., a Colorado corporation,
Defendants.
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND DISMISSING CASE
Blackburn, J.
This matter is before me on Plaintiff’s Response to Order To Show Cause
[#77]1 filed April 25, 2012. By order entered April 5, 2012, I directed plaintiff to show
cause why this action should not be administratively closed pending resolution of the
bankruptcy proceedings against defendants. (Order To Show Cause [#76] filed April
59, 2012.) Plaintiff’s response discharges her obligations under my order.
Moreover, plaintiff suggests that this action may not only be administratively
closed, but dismissed, as the debtor has been discharged in bankruptcy. (See
Plaintiff’s Response to Order To Show Cause ¶ 1 & Exh. 1 [#77], filed April 25,
2012.) I enter this order to effectuate that dismissal.
1
“[#77]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Order To Show Cause [#76] filed April 59, 2012, is DISCHARGED;
2. That plaintiff’s claims against defendants, Sam Jahani, D.O., and Urgent
Care, Inc., a Colorado corporation, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
3. That this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Dated April 30, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?