Andexler et al v. Petroglyph Operating Company, Inc. et al

Filing 29

ORDER of Dismissal. Court having reviewed the 28 Stipulated Motion for Dismissal, all claims asserted are dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear his, her or its own costs and attorneys' fees. Clerk to close this case, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 2/9/10.(gms, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger Civil Action No. 09-cv-01115-MSK-KLM SHIRLEY ANDEXLER; LYNN and DEBORAH BARNES; MARY F. COWAN, CAROLYN CREEKMORE, and JAMES RANALS; JAMES and ANN CONLEY; BILL and LORI CORDOVA; DONALD and TAMARA DEROWITSCH; ROBERT ENGLISH and DONNA ZERBE; RICHARD and VIRGILIA GOODWIN; BRUCE and SHARON HOPKE; JACK and CYNTHIA HOUGHTELLING; JOHN IRELAND and KEVIN MURPHY; TERRI KERMAN; JOAN and KEITH LIGHTCAP; MARY BETH and ROBERT MARTIN; JOHN and KAREN RHOADS; DAWN and GERE RYERSON; DUANE and SHIRLEE SPEH, Plaintiffs, v. PETROGLYPH OPERATING COMPANY, INC., a Kansas Corporation; PETROGLYPH ENERGY, INC., an Idaho Corporation; III EXPLORATION COMPANY, an Idaho Corporation; III EXPLORATION II LP, an Idaho Limited Partnership; INTERMOUNTAIN INDUSTRIES, INC., an Idaho Corporation; and THOMAS MELLAND, an individual, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND TO CLOSE CASE THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice (Motion) (#28) filed February 9, 2010. The Court having reviewed the foregoing: ORDERS that all claims asserted in the above-captioned matter are dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear his, her or its own costs and attorneys' fees incurred in connection with this action. The Clerk shall close this case. DATED this 9th day of February, 2010. BY THE COURT: Marcia S. Krieger United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?