Price v. Astrue

Filing 8

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 8/31/2009. SS Defendants Brief due by 9/30/2009. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 10/15/2009, by Judge John L. Kane on 8/10/09. (gms, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-01153-AP IDA L. PRICE Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff Paul Radosevich Attorney at Law 1621 York Street Denver, CO 80206 Telephone: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] For Defendant Troy A Eid United States Attorney Kevin Traskos Deputy Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado 1225 Seventeenth Street, Suite 700 Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] By: Stephanie F. Kiley Special Assistant United States Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel, Region VIII Social Security Administration 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001A Denver, CO 80294 Telephone: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail]

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. Date Complaint was Filed: May 20, 2009 B. Date Complaint was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: May 22, 2009 C. Date Answer and Administrative Record were Filed: July 21,2009 4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD Upon preliminary analysis, there are no issues with the accuracy or completeness of the administrative record. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE None. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES There are no unusual claims. 7. OTHER MATTERS None. 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: August 31, 2009 B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: September 30, 2009 C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief Due: October 15, 2009 9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT Oral argument is not requested.

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE A. ( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. B. (x) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a Unite States Magistrate Judge. 11. OTHER MATTERS THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C. COLO.LCivR 7.1(c) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. 12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED this 10th day of August, 2009. BY THE COURT:

s/John L. Kane U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVED: s/Paul Radosevich Paul Radosevich Attorney at Law 1621 York Street Denver, CO 80206 Telephone: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] DAVID M. GAOUETTE United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Deputy Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado 1225 17th Street, Suite 700 Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail] s/Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley Stephanie F. Kiley Special Assistant United States Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel, Region VIII Social Security Administration 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001A Denver, CO 80294 Telephone: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail]