Rocky Mountain Tracking, Inc. v. Portman Security Systems (USA), Ltd.

Filing 4

ORDER REMANDING CASE. This action is remanded to the Larimer County District Court, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 05/21/09. (wjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger Civil Action No. 09-cv-01156-MSK ROCKY MOUNTAIN TRACKING, INC., a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff, v. PORTMAN SECURITY SYSTEMS (USA) LTD., a Massachusetts corporation, Defendant. ORDER REMANDING CASE THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte. The Plaintiff commenced this action in the Larimer County District Court. Plaintiff alleges damages arising from the purchase from Defendant of certain "global positioning system" devices, including alleged loss of profits and other special damages. In its Complaint, the Plaintiff did not request any particular monetary relief. In the Notice of Removal, the Defendant asserts that this Court can exercise jurisdiction based upon diversity pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1332. The Defendant relies primarily upon the Plaintiff's election in the mandatory Colorado Civil Cover Sheet stating: "This party is seeking a monetary judgment for more than $100,000 against another party, including any attorney fees, penalties or punitive damages, but excluding interest and costs[.]" The statement that the Plaintiff represented to the Defendant that its alleged damages exceed the jurisdictional amount is inspecific and conclusory. The claims in the Complaint assert that Plaintiff purchased products for approximately $23,000 which did not perform as advertised. Without any quantification of damages in excess of the purchase price, such conclusory statement is insufficient to establish that the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. In accordance with the analysis set forth in Baker v. Sears Holding Corp., 557 F. Supp. 2d 1208 (D. Colo. 2007), there has been an insufficient showing of the requisite amount in controversy to establish diversity jurisdiction. Accordingly, the action must be remanded to the State Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is REMANDED to the Larimer County District Court. DATED this 21st day of May, 2009. BY THE COURT: Marcia S. Krieger United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?