Coletti v. Astrue
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER), SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 11/2/2009. SS Defendants Brief due by 12/2/2009. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 12/17/2009 by Judge John L. Kane on 9/22/09. (gms, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-01164-AP LANCE M. COLETTI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________________ JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES ________________________________________________________________________ 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: Michael A. Desaulniers, No. 22593 402 W. 12th Street Pueblo, CO 81003 (719) 543-8636 email@example.com For Defendant: DAVID M. GAOUETTE United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Deputy Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado firstname.lastname@example.org ANTHONY J. NAVARRO, No. 31274 Special Assistant United States Attorney 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001A Denver, Colorado 80294 (303) 844-7278 Anthony.email@example.com 2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION -1-
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. Date Complaint Was Filed: May 22, 2009 B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: June 29, 2009 C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: August 31, 2009 4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD To the best of their knowledge, the parties state that the administrative record is complete. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES There are no unusual claims or defenses in this case. 7. OTHER MATTERS There are no other matters. 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE A. Plaintiffs Opening Brief Due: November 2, 2009 B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: December 2, 2009 C. Plaintiffs Reply Brief (If Any) Due: December 17, 2009
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT -2-
A. Plaintiffs Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument. B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument 10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. 11. OTHER MATTERS THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. 12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED this 22nd day of September, 2009. BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane ________________
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED: For Plaintiff: s/ Michael A. Desaulniers MICHAEL A. DESAULNIERS 402 W. 12th Street Pueblo, CO 81003 Telephone: (719) 543-8636 firstname.lastname@example.org Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellant For Defendant: DAVID M. GAOUETTE United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Deputy Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado email@example.com s/ Anthony J. Navarro Anthony J. Navarro Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001A Denver, Colorado 80294 (303) 844-7278 firstname.lastname@example.org Attorneys for Defendant-Appellee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?