Cohen v. Longshore et al

Filing 76

ORDER. The recommendation is accepted and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b) for Plaintiffs failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the Courts Orders, the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/8/2011.(sah, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE
Civil Case No. 09-cv-01169-LTB-CBS
SOLOMON B. COHEN,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN P. LONGSHORE, and
UNKNOWN MAIL CLERK, El Paso County Sheriff’s Office
Defendants.
________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
________________________________________________________________________

This case is before me on the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge issued and
served on October 24, 2011 (Doc 75). Plaintiff has failed to file specific written objections
to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation and is therefore barred from de novo review.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the recommendation is accepted and this action is DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b) for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and failure
to comply with the Court’s Orders, the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District
Court for the District of Colorado, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
BY THE COURT:

s/Lewis T. Babcock
Lewis T. Babcock, Judge
DATED: November 8, 2011