Schlenker v. City of Arvada, Colorado et al

Filing 135

MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 113 Plaintiffs Motion to Permit Further Discovery Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f) by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 3/4/2010.(klmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-01189-WDM-KLM GERALD SCHLENKER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF ARVADA, COLORADO, CHARLES J. HUMPHREY, in his individual capacity, JOSEPH HERTEL, in his individual capacity, KELLY SHEEHAN, in his individual capacity, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Permit Further Discovery Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f) [Docket No. 113; Filed January 6, 2010] (the "Motion"). Defendants Sharp and Patel filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's 1983 Claims Against Them [Docket No. 43; Filed August 6, 2009] ("Motion No. 43"). In its Order of December 9, 2009 [Docket No. 108], the Court indicated that it would convert Defendants' Motion to Dismiss into a Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(d). In the instant Motion, Plaintiff requests an extension of time in which to file his response. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff and Defendants Sharp and Patel now have filed a Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice of Defendants William Sharp, M.D. and Lisa Patel, M.D. Only [Docket No. 131; Filed March 3, 2010]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED as moot. Dated: March 4, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?