Powers v. Hautzinger et al

Filing 75

ORDER. The unopposed Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 34 filed 10/27/2009, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court. Plaintiffs Emergency Request For a Restraining Order To Prohibit State Employees From Blocking Access To This Honorable Federal Court 23 filed 09/10/2009, is DENIED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 04/07/2010.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 09-cv-01190-REB-BNB JOHN J. POWERS, Plaintiff, v. PETE HAUTZINGER, District Attorney, Defendant. ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Blackburn, J. The matter before me is the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#34] filed October 27, 2009. No objections having been filed to the recommendation, I review it only for plain error. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 418 F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005).1 Finding no such error in the magistrate judge's recommended disposition, I find and conclude that the recommendation should be approved and adopted. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the unopposed Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#34] filed October 27, 2009, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court; and This standard pertains even though plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter. MoralesFernandez, 418 F.3d at 1122. 1 2. That plaintiff's Emergency Request For a Restraining Order To Prohibit State Employees From Blocking Access To This Honorable Federal Court [#23] filed September 10, 2009, is DENIED. Dated April 7, 2010, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?