BIAX Corporation v. NVIDIA Corporation et al
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 1099 Defendant Sony's Motion for Issuance of Writ of Execution, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/16/2013. (mehcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 09-cv-01257-PAB-MEH
SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA, INC., and
SONY ELECTRONICS, INC.,
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on September 16, 2013.
Defendant Sony’s Motion for Issuance of Writ of Execution [filed September 16, 2013;
docket #1099] is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A,
The court will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P.
12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before filing the
motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good-faith efforts to confer with
opposing counsel or a pro se party to resolve the disputed matter. The moving party
shall state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific
efforts to comply with this rule.
(emphasis added). The Court reminds the parties of their continuing obligations to comply fully
with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. See Hoelzel v. First Select Corp., 214 F.R.D. 634, 636 (D. Colo.
2003) (because Rule 7.1A requires meaningful negotiations by the parties, the rule is not satisfied
by one party sending the other party a single email, letter or voicemail).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?