Rocky Mountain Wild et al v. Vilsack et al
Filing
76
ORDER granting 75 the parties Joint Motion to Lift Stay and Set Briefing Schedule. The stay on briefing Petitioners Motion for Attorneys Fees is LIFTED. The parties are DIRECTED to proceed with briefing on Petitioners Motion for Attorneys Fees, by Judge William J. Martinez on 12/21/2012.(ervsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 09-cv-01272-WJM
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, a Colorado non-profit corporation, and
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a New Mexico non-profit corporation,
Petitioners,
v.
TOM VILSACK, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Agriculture,
TOM TIDWELL, in his official capacity as the Chief Forester of the U.S. Forest Service,
THOMAS MALECEK, in his official capacity as District Ranger for the Rio Grande
National Forest, and
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture,
Respondents.
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO LIFT STAY AND
SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Lift Stay and Set
Briefing Schedule filed December 17, 2012 (ECF No. 75). The Court having reviewed
the Motion and finding good cause exists the Court ORDERS as follows:
The parties’ Join Motion is GRANTED. The stay on briefing Petitioners’ Motion
for Attorneys’ Fees is LIFTED. The parties are DIRECTED to proceed with briefing on
Petitioners’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees according to the schedule below:
February 19, 2013: Petitioners’ opening brief due.
April 5, 2013: Respondents’ response brief due.
May 3, 2013: Petitioners’ reply brief due
Given the amount of time being allowed to the parties in this briefing schedule,
they are placed on notice that the Court will not entertain any motion for an extension
of any of the deadlines set forth in this Order.
Dated this 21st day of December, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
__________________________
William J. Martínez
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?