Michaels v. AKAL Security, Inc.
ORDER denying as moot 5 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Alternative Motion for Joinder, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 7/1/09.(gmssl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior Judge Zita L. Weinshienk Civil Action No. 09-cv-01300-ZLW-CBS SUE ANNE MICHAELS, Plaintiff, v. AKAL SECURITY, INC., Defendant.
ORDER The matter before the Court is Defendant's Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(7) And 19 Motion To Dismiss And Alternative Motion For Joinder (Doc. No. 5). Plaintiff's response conceded that the United States Marshals Service was a necessary party to the case.1 Plaintiff subsequently filed Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint adding Eric Holder, Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice, as a party to the case.2 Accordingly, it is
Doc. No. 12; June 26, 2009.
Doc. No. 13; June 30, 2009. The amendment appears to have been done pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2), with Defendant's motion for joinder taken as the implicit consent to amend from the opposing party. Regardless of this consent, the Court finds the amendment is the appropriate resolution to the omission of the necessary party.
ORDERED that Defendant's Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(7) And 19 Motion To Dismiss And Alternative Motion For Joinder (Doc. No. 5; June 3, 2009) is denied as moot. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 1st day of July, 2009. BY THE COURT:
________________________________ ZITA L. WEINSHIENK, Senior Judge United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?