Revello v. Schissler et al

Filing 65

MINUTE ORDER denying 62 Plaintiff's Motion for Copies of Transcripts of Deposition Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(f)(3), by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/29/2009.(wjc, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-01348-MSK-MEH HERMAN REVELLO, Plaintiff, v. MEDICAL SUPERVISOR SCHISSLER, COURT SERVICES SUPERVISOR ARGO, and NURSE P.J., Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on December 29, 2009. Plaintiff's Motion for Copies of Transcripts of Deposition Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(f)(3) [filed December 28, 2009; docket #62] is denied. As provided in Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(f)(3), any party or the deponent may obtain a copy of a deposition transcript from the officer who recorded the deposition upon a payment of reasonable charges. The Court possesses no copies of such transcripts (see Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1)) and, upon review of the record, observes that the transcript has not been filed as an attachment to any pleading or motion in this case. Additionally, there is no indication in the motion that the Plaintiff has attempted to obtain a copy of the transcript from the recording officer or from the Defendants.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?