Kenfield v. Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment

Filing 40

MINUTE ORDER: granting 38 Consented Motion for Extension of Scheduling Order Deadlines. Expert Witness Disclosures: The parties shall designate all experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on o r before January 21, 2010; The parties shall designate all rebuttal experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before February 23, 2010; Service of Last Written Discovery Requests: April 27, 2010 Discovery Cut-off: June 1, 2010 Dispositive Motion Deadline: July 12, 2010, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/11/09.(bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-01390-MSK-BNB JANELL KENFIELD, formerly known as Janell Bezdek, Plaintiff, v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH & ENVIRONMENT, a department of the State of Colorado, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ Minute Order Entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland This matter is before the Court on the Consented Motion for Extension of Scheduling Order Deadlines [docket no. 38, filed December 10, 2009] (the "Motion"). IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and the Scheduling Order is amended as follows: Expert Witness Disclosures: The parties shall designate all experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before January 21, 2010; The parties shall designate all rebuttal experts and provide opposing counsel with all information specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before February 23, 2010; Service of Last Written Discovery Requests: Discovery Cut-off: Dispositive Motion Deadline: DATED: December 11, 2009 April 27, 2010 June 1, 2010 July 12, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?