Dobbs v. Morbank, Inc.
Filing
100
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Telephonic Motion Hearing held on 11/1/2011, granting in part and denying in part 77 Plaintiff's Combined Motion to Compel Supplementation of Discovery Responses, Motion for Sanctions, and Motion to Allow Supplemental Discovery and a Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition for Trial Preservation Purposes. (FTR: C. Coomes -- Courtroom A-501) (mehcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL E. HEGARTY
Civil Action No. 09-cv-01403-MSK-MEH
Courtroom Deputy: Cathy Coomes
Date: November 1, 2011
FTR – Courtroom A501
ALEXANDER A. DOBBS,
Gerald P. McDermott
William James Hansen
Plaintiff,
vs.
MORBARK, INC.,
Steven M. Hamilton
Kevin G. Dougherty
(by phone)
Defendants.
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
TELEPHONIC MOTION HEARING
Court in session:
2:10 p.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
Argument and discussion regarding Plaintiff’s Combined Motion to Compel Supplementation of
Discovery Responses, Motion for Sanctions, and Motion to Allow Supplemental Discovery and a
Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition for Trial Preservation Purposes (Doc. #77, filed 9/16/11).
ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Combined Motion to Compel Supplementation of Discovery Responses,
Motion for Sanctions, and Motion to Allow Supplemental Discovery and a Rule
30(b)(6) Deposition for Trial Preservation Purposes (Doc. #77, filed 9/16/11) is
GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as stated on the record. Plaintiff
may supplement its expert report on or before November 18, 2011. Defendant
may supplement its expert report, if necessary, on or before December 9, 2011.
The Court will allow a brief supplemental deposition based only on any changes to
expert opinions.
Court in recess:
2:46 p.m. (Hearing concluded)
Total time in court: 0:36
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?