Whitmore et al v. Statguard, LLC et al

Filing 53

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 49 Motion for Protective Order and Response to Motion to Compel. Defendants may re-file their response and motion in separate documents on or before 10/13/2009. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/8/2009. (mehcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-01414-REB-MEH MICHELE WHITMORE, WKF ENTERPRISES, LLC, WANDA K. FORD, DYLAN MUMM, CARLYN MUMM, and KATHRYN FORD, Plaintiffs, v. STATGUARD, LLC, DAVID KIM STANLEY, MICHAEL J. LEARY, CHARLES S. BRADFORD, BRUCE HOOVER, and LINDA MITCHELL, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on October 8, 2009. Defendants' Motion for Protective Order & Response to Motion to Compel [filed October 6, 2009; docket #49] is denied without prejudice for failing to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A and 7.1C ("A motion shall not be included in a response or reply to the original motion. A motion shall be made in a separate paper."). On or before October 13, 2009, Defendants may re-file their response and motion in separate papers and shall include in the motion a certification reflecting compliance with Rule 7.1A.