Pama Ventures, LLC v. Wellens

Filing 87

ORDER. The Joint Stipulation by the Parties as to the Appropriate Attorneys Fee and Cost Award 85 filed 07/14/2010, is APPROVED. JUDGMENT SHALL ENTER in favor of the plaintiff, PAMA Ventures, LLC, and against the defendant, Brian Wellens. The pl aintiff is AWARDED damages. The plaintiff is AWARDED interest on all amounts unpaid at the rate of two percent (2%) per month from 07/17/2010. The Plaintiffs Motion for Costs, Attorneys Fees, and Interest Due Pursuant To D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.3 and Courts Order of June 24, 2010 84 filed07/08/2010, is DENIED as moot. This case is CLOSED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 07/23/2010.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 09-cv-01426-REB-CBS PAMA VENTURES, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN WELLENS, Defendant. ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION & FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Blackburn, J. The matters before me are: 1) Plaintiff's Motion for Costs, Attorneys' Fees, and Interest Due Pursuant To D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.3 and Court's Order of June 24, 2010 [#84]1 filed July 8, 2010; and 2) the Joint Stipulation by the Parties as to the Appropriate Attorneys Fee and Cost Award [#85] filed July 14, 2010. I approve the stipulation, deny the motion for costs and fees as moot, and direct the entry of judgment. On June 24, 2010, I issued my Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [#81]. I delayed the entry of judgment to provide the plaintiff, PAMA Ventures, LLC, a reasonable opportunity to file a motion seeking and circumstantiating its costs of collection and reasonable attorney fees. The parties since have stipulated "[#53]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. 1 that a reasonable attorney fees award in this case is 100,000 dollars and that a reasonable cost award is 4,445.52 dollars. Joint Stipulation by the Parties as to the Appropriate Attorneys Fee and Cost Award [#85], filed July 14, 2010. The parties' stipulation resolves the remaining issues in this case. Based on my Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [#81] filed June 24, 2010, and on the Joint Stipulation by the Parties as to the Appropriate Attorneys Fee and Cost Award [#85] filed July 14, 2010, I order the entry of judgment in this case. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Joint Stipulation by the Parties as to the Appropriate Attorneys Fee and Cost Award [#85] filed July 14, 2010, is APPROVED; 2. That JUDGMENT SHALL ENTER in favor of the plaintiff, PAMA Ventures, LLC, and against the defendant, Brian Wellens; 3. That the plaintiff is AWARDED damages in the following amounts: A. 965,000.00 dollars, representing the principal due under the promissory note at issue in this litigation; plus B. 385,867.80 dollars, representing the amount of interest due as of July 16, 2010; plus C. 100,000.00 dollars, representing reasonable attorney fees incurred by PAMA Ventures, LLC; plus D. 4,445.52 dollars, representing reasonable costs incurred by PAMA Ventures, LLC; 4. That the plaintiff is AWARDED interest on all amounts unpaid at the rate of 2 two percent (2%) per month from July 17, 2010; 5. That this court RETAINS jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' stipulation, including jurisdiction to adjust the judgment, if appropriate, on motion of the plaintiff, PAMA Ventures, LLC, to account for accrued interest and any additional costs of collection, such as attorney fees necessary to execute on the judgment; 6. That in order to file a motion seeking to adjust the judgment in this case, plaintiff, PAMA Ventures, LLC, first MUST FILE a motion to re-open this case, demonstrating good cause to re-open, along with any motion to adjust the judgment; 7. That the Plaintiff's Motion for Costs, Attorneys' Fees, and Interest Due Pursuant To D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.3 and Court's Order of June 24, 2010 [#84] filed July 8, 2010, is DENIED as moot; and 8. That this case is CLOSED. Dated July 23, 2010, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?