Watkins v. Ruddy et al

Filing 61

ORDER. The Joint Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs 8th Amendment Claims In The First and Second Claims For Relief and The Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Claims For Relief With Prejudice 57 filed 07/09/2010, is GRANTED. Plaintiffs 8th Amendment claims as stated in his First and Second Claims for relief are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiffs Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Claims for relief are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 07/12/2010.(sah, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 09-cv-01534-REB-MJW JAMES R. WATKINS, Plaintiff, v. DENVER POLICE OFFICER JOHN RUDDY, DENVER POLICE OFFICER RANDY PENN, individually and severally, and CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, Defendants. ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS Blackburn, J. The matter before me is the Joint Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's 8th Amendment Claims In The First and Second Claims For Relief and The Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Claims For Relief With Prejudice [#57] filed July 9, 2010. After reviewing the motion and the file, I conclude that the motion should be granted. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Joint Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff's 8th Amendment Claims In The First and Second Claims For Relief and The Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Claims For Relief With Prejudice [#57] filed July 9, 2010, is GRANTED; 2. That plaintiff's 8th Amendment claims as stated in his First and Second Claims for relief are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and

3. That plaintiff's Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Claims for relief are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Dated July 12, 2010, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT:

2