Rutledge v. Astrue
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 1/25/2010. SS Defendants Brief due by 2/24/2010. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 3/11/2010, by Judge John L. Kane on 10/30/09. (gmssl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-01537-AP DON W. RUTLEDGE, v. Plaintiff,
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES ______________________________________________________________________________ 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: Rick P. Sauer 700 Macon Ave. Caņon City, CO 81212 719.275.7591 719.275.6165 (fax) email@example.com For Defendant: Sandra Krider Special Assistant United States Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001-A Denver, CO 80294 303.844.0015 303.844.0770 (fax) firstname.lastname@example.org 2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
This is a Social Security appeal. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. B. C. Date Complaint Was Filed: June 30, 2009 Date Complaint was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: August 14, 2009 Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: October 13, 2009
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
It appears the Administrative Record is complete and accurate. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Plaintiff does not intend to submit additional evidence at this time. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES
This case does not provide any unusual claims or defenses. 7. OTHER MATTERS
Plaintiff does not have any other matters to raise at this time. However, Plaintiff has filed a new application for social security benefits. He has not yet received a ruling on the new application. 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief: January 25, 2010
Plaintiff's counsel will be out of the office for the last week in November 2009 and all of December 2009. He therefore requests a briefing deadline outside the traditional 40 days. As he already has Social Security disability briefs due on January 11, 2010, and January 18, 2010, he requests a deadline of January 25, 2010 for the brief in this case. Defendant's counsel does not oppose this request. B. C. 9. Response Brief due: February 24, 2010 Reply Brief due: March 11, 2010
STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. B. Plaintiff's Statement: The Plaintiff does not request oral argument. Defendant's Statement: The Defendant does not request oral argument.
CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE A. B. () All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. 12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED this 30th day of October, 2009 BY THE COURT: s/John L. Kane U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED: /s Rick P. Sauer Rick P. Sauer 700 Macon Ave. Caņon City, CO 81212 719.275.7591 719.275.6165 (fax) email@example.com Attorney for Plaintiff
DAVID M. GAOUETTE United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Deputy Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado Kevin.Traskos@usdoj.gov /s Sandra T. Krider Sandra T. Krider Special Assistant United States Attorney 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001-A Denver, CO 80294 303.844.0015 303.844.0770 (fax) firstname.lastname@example.org Attorneys for Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?